Peer-Review Process
The Journal adheres to the highest standards of quality and integrity by implementing a Double-Blind Peer Review system. This ensures that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous, promoting total objectivity in academic evaluation.
Peer-Review Stages:
-
Submission and Initial Screening: Upon receipt, the editorial board reviews the manuscript for compliance with the "Author Guidelines" and the journal’s scope.
-
Reviewer Assignment: If the manuscript passes initial screening, it is assigned to two or more specialized experts based on their scholarly expertise in the subject area.
-
Technical Evaluation: Reviewers independently evaluate the manuscript based on originality, methodology, accuracy of results, and citation integrity, providing a detailed recommendation report.
-
Review Analysis: The editorial board analyzes the reports. In case of conflicting opinions, a third "tie-breaker" reviewer is consulted.
-
Editorial Decision: The author is notified of the final decision (Acceptance, Acceptance with Revisions, or Rejection) and provided with the reviewers' feedback.
-
Manuscript Revision: If revisions are required, the author must submit the updated manuscript within the specified timeframe. This version may undergo a second review to ensure all requirements are met.
-
Final Acceptance and Publication: Once all requirements are fulfilled, a formal acceptance letter is issued, and the research is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue.
