Reviewer Selection & Membership Criteria

To maintain the highest scholarly standards, the Journal relies on a distinguished pool of experts. Peer reviewers are selected based on the following rigorous criteria:

1. Professional and Ethical Standards:

  • Integrity and Objectivity: Reviewers must demonstrate absolute honesty, scientific integrity, and impartiality.

  • Punctuality: A commitment to completing the review process within the deadlines set by the Editorial Board.

  • Specialized Expertise: Mastery of a narrow scientific specialty and staying current with its latest developments.

  • Academic Rank and Experience: Reviewers must hold the rank of (Assistant Professor) or higher and have a proven track record of reviewing at least 10 manuscripts for peer-reviewed journals.

  • Constructive Feedback: The ability to provide precise, professional, and constructive critiques that assist authors in improving their work.

  • Confidentiality: Strict adherence to the journal’s privacy policy and the double-blind peer review protocols.

2. Cooperation and Partnerships:

  • The journal recognizes and utilizes the accredited reviewers’ list from the Libyan Association for E-Learning.

  • Accredited reviewers are entitled to benefit from the various services and privileges offered by the journal in recognition of their academic contributions.

  • Communication is facilitated through the official channels of the publisher.

3. Membership and Certification Requirements: Applicants wishing to join the review board and obtain a reviewer certificate must submit:

  • An updated and detailed Curriculum Vitae (CV).

  • Links to professional profiles on academic platforms: (Google Scholar, ResearchGate, Scopus).

  • Valid identification and official academic credentials.